by Worawut Saraphan
8.1.1 General Aspects of the Digital Era
Today’s world is dominated by telecommunications,
information networks, and electronic devices, altering how information is
disseminated and consumed. We have called our time the Digital Era.
However, the Digital Era is not understood simply as being
surrounded by new technologies and gadgets. It has shaped the human context to
reflect the newness of a new era.
Philosophically speaking, the Digital Era was an extension
of Neo-Enlightenment, when people held strong beliefs and convictions in
science and logic. Likewise, the Industrial Revolution changed every aspect of
people’s lives.
In the book "Memory Bytes: History, Technology, and
Digital Culture,” the authors suggest some general aspects of the Digital Era
as follows (“Memory Bytes: History, Technology, and Digital Culture,” 2004):
8.1.1.1 Technological Revolution and Continuity
The digital era can be identified with the widespread use of
computers. Today, everything is computerized or digitalized, which is called
digital culture. This digital revolution has its own legacy, even though computer
use is not the first technical revolution in human history.
For example, the introduction of the personal
computer (PC) in the 1970s marked a turning point in the Digital Era. From a
Supercomputer to a PC, this new cutting-edge technology has become more
accessible and available. However, Computerization and digitalization paved the
way for the emergence of the internet and mobile technologies that characterize
our modern Digital world.
8.1.1.2 Economic Development
The Digital Era is driven by
capitalist industrialization. To illustrate this point, digital gadgets became mass-produced
and consumed in the 20th century.
For example, the
invention of telegrams, radio, TV, cell phones, and other forms of
communication changed how people talked to each other even more, leading to new
cultural norms and shared experiences beyond physical borders.
8.1.1.3 Digital Culture
Even though we have described
our technological advancements and modern lifestyle as "digital culture,"
its definition is still unclear. The simplest explanation was that digital
culture refers to a society saturated by telecommunications, information
networks, and computerization.
For example, DOT COM was
used to refer to the Digital Era and the widespread access to the World Wide
Web.
8.1.1.4 Impact on Society
By the 1990s, digital technologies had become essential,
integrating various aspects of life, including leisure, education, and
healthcare. We have had a clearer vision of the digital era for the past decades thanks to scientific research, technological progress, globalization, and world economic forces.
For example, digital literacy has become compulsory
for all professions. People use mobile phones, Internet access, and iPads for
various purposes.
8.1.1.5 Cultural and Political Dimensions
The development and application of digital technologies are
deeply intertwined with cultural and political topics for discussion. The
commodification of digital products reflects broader societal trends and the
politics of production and consumption.
For example, Fintech, or "financial
technology," refers to the innovative use of technology to improve and
automate the delivery and use of financial services. Fintech impacts every
aspect of people’s lives, culturally, economically, politically, and
academically.
8.1.1.6 Philosophical and Historical Framework
The Digital Era has had a philosophical and historical
impact on humanity. The convergence of technological advancement, national
development, and corporate interests significantly shapes today’s digital
culture.
For example, Digital leadership is both a skill and a
characteristic of leaders who can lead the organization through rapid
technological change and transformation during this decisive moment of
embracing the Digital Era.
The book Memory Bytes: History, Technology, and Digital
Culture highlights these aspects, highlighting the complexity and multifaceted
nature of the Digital Era. To understand its exact characteristics, we need to
deepen the historical context of our time and digital transformation and
acceptance. This is not just identifying the Digital Era as the rise of new
technological advancements and gadgets but also as a way of life, how people
interact with each other, and how we interact with machines.
8.1.2 Paradigm Shift from Education 1.0 to 4.0
The Digital Era has had a radical impact on the educational
sphere. Together with the evolution of the pedagogical learning mode, education
has changed from Education 1.0 to Education 4.0. We will explore this point in
detail.
8.1.2.1 Education 1.0
Education 1.0 always speaks of the conventional approach to
learning. Like teachers and professors, educators are responsible for imparting
factual knowledge and required skills to their students. Often defining
education 1.0 as a teacher-centered approach and the absence of contemporary
tools. Nevertheless, efforts have been made to transcend Education 1.0 to the
more advanced learning model for the past century. The classroom transforms,
for instance, into a more interactive and student-centered learning environment.
Introducing new technologies inspires students to acquire more critical
thinking and problem-solving abilities. We investigate the main ideas of
Education 1.0 and its development below.
8.1.2.1.1 Traditional Educational Model
● Focus
on Knowledge Transmission: Education 1.0 is centered around delivering
factual knowledge and basic skills. It is often characterized by a didactic
approach where teachers are the primary source of information, and students are
passive recipients. (Pies, 2017)
● Teacher-Centered
Approach: This model relies heavily on the authority of the teacher, who
directs the learning process and controls the flow of information. The role of
the student is essentially to absorb and reproduce the knowledge imparted by
the teacher. (M. Žitinski, 2005)
● Standardized
Curriculum: The curriculum in Education 1.0 is typically standardized, focusing
on core subjects such as mathematics, science, and language arts. The aim is to
equip students with the essential knowledge and skills for everyday life and
work. (Vladimir, 2018)
8.1.2.1.2 Limitations and Criticisms
● Lack
of Critical Thinking: One of the main criticisms of Education 1.0 is its
limited emphasis on critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Focusing on rote
memorization and standardized testing can stifle creativity and independent
thought. (M. Žitinski, 2005).
● Inflexibility:
Education becomes fixed because of the rigid structure of Education 1.0. It
often fails to accommodate diverse learning styles and students' needs, leading
to disengagement and a lack of motivation among students (Vladimir, 2018).
● Limited
Use of Technology: Traditional educational models often lack technology,
making it impossible for students to extend their learning experience outside
their classroom (Waks, 2012).
While Education 1.0 has been foundational in providing basic
education, its limitations have prompted the development of more dynamic and
interactive educational models. The evolution towards Education 2.0 and beyond
reflects a growing recognition of the need for education systems to adapt to
the demands of the 21st century, incorporating technology and fostering skills
such as critical thinking and collaboration. However, the transition is challenging,
including cost-effectiveness issues and the need for systemic change in
educational institutions. (Valiente, 2010).
8.1.2.2 Education 2.0
Education 2.0 represents a transformative approach to
learning. Web 2.0 has become standard on the Internet, which has evolved from
traditional World Wide Web 1.0 technologies. It enhances academic students and
researchers with experiences of interactivity, collaboration, and
personalization. The use of digital tools has become a paradigm shift in
education. It helps to facilitate education, becoming more and more adaptive
and collaborative within a modern learning environment. It also enables
students to engage with available content and peers worldwide. The following
sections explore the critical aspects of Education 2.0, drawing insights into
the research papers provided.
8.1.2.2.1 Web 2.0 Tools and Collaborative Learning
● Adaptive
Learning Platforms: The example of iLearning Education 2.0 (iDu 2.0) was a web-based
learning platform with adaptive collaborative capacity for students. These
platforms support online and distance learning. It allows students to work more
flexibly on assignments. iDu 2.0 is an open-source
Learning Management System (LMS) that allows developers to improve the software
for better online and distant learning experiences. (Padeli et al., 2022)
(iLearning Education 2.0 Based MooC Platform as Collaborative Learning Smart
Technology, 2022)
● Social
Learning and Interactivity: While Web 1.0 merely provides information, Web
2.0, such as podcasts, blogs, wikis, and social networks, are more interactive
and respond to the needs of the users. It enables us to interact with the
global community and become content creators and providers. Not to mention how
Web 2.0 benefits the field of education. Teachers and students can use Web 2.0
tools and platforms for the study and research (Álvarez & Zapata, 2019).
8.1.2.2.2 Creativity and Digital Skills
● Creativity
2.0: In industry 2.0, besides digital skills, creativity is also a
cooperation requirement; it is called Creativity 2.0. It implies digital
literacy and capacity for Research and Development (R&D). Trends of
Education 2.0 urges schools to prepare students for this. Not just the skill
they can collaborate and integrate diverse skills to meet the job description’s
demands in a response to the creative economy (Bilton, 2020)
8.1.2.2.2 E-Learning and Digital Identity
● E-Learning
Environments: Education 2.0 can be highlighted within the use of the Web
2.0 platform, especially when E-Learning was introduced. E-learning can enhance
students' satisfaction when the regular classroom is not possible. Now,
teacher-student interaction and collaboration through E-Learning are still
considered and developed. (Tirziu & Vrabie, 2015)
● Digital
Identity Risk: E-learning requires students to have digital identities and register,
which creates a challenge of misuse and abuse. However, clear instructions and
policies must be established for students to use the Internet and social media,
such as non-cyberbullying, showing face and involvement in the online
classroom, etc.
8.1.2.2.3 Challenges and Opportunities in Education 2.0
● Global
and Diverse Learning Contexts: The Internet and social communication have
become more available to help students worldwide interact with each other. This
can go beyond educational levels and institutions without borders. However,
there are some challenges in sustaining online programs, achieving course
consistency, and training faculty amidst technological changes and funding
constraints (Cook & Grant-Davie, 2016).
● Developing
Regions: The use of Internet communication and learning platforms can
extend opportunities for education in regions with limited resources, such as
Africa or Southeast Asia. Some innovative projects, like the one in Zambia,
demonstrate how Learning 2.0 can overcome educational challenges and promote
national development in a knowledge economy (Kim, 2017).
While Education 2.0 offers promising benefits, some
challenges can be addressed, such as privacy and security issues, sufficiency availability,
and accessibility. For Education 2.0, schools commit to providing these tools
for educational purposes. Additionally, research is ongoing to ensure the best
use and adoption of modern technology in the academic field.
8.1.2.3 Education 3.0
How to understand Education 3.0, some approaches, such as
integrating technology, personalized learning, and student development of
critical skills, are necessary for 21st-century skills. The Education 3.0 model
focuses on self-directed learning and how students can use modern tools to
respond to their needs. Here are some characteristics of Education 3.0, as
follows:
8.1.2.3.1 Integration of Technology and Personalized Learning
● Education
3.0 leverages advanced technologies such as Web 3.0, which includes innovations
like Big Data, virtual reality, and augmented reality, to create interactive
and personalized learning environments. These technologies transform passive
learners into active participants, enhancing engagement and learning outcomes
(Klaus, 2023).
● The
pedagogical approach emphasizes self-determined learning and is central to
Education 3.0. This approach encourages students to build personal learning
environments and use multiple tools for authentic evaluations, thus fostering
independence and critical thinking (Qassrawi, 2022).
● The
Mutual Learning Community (MLCOM) system proposed in Thailand exemplifies
Education 3.0 by combining virtual and mobile learning environments to enhance
21st-century skills among learners (Songkram et al., 2021).
8.1.2.3.2 Entrepreneurial and Research-Oriented Education
● The
University 3.0 model, a subset of Education 3.0, integrates teaching, research,
and entrepreneurship. This model prepares graduates with competencies that
align with the demands of Industry 4.0, emphasizing innovation and the
commercialization of educational achievements (Rodin et al., 2024) (“Challenges
of the New Age: Ensuring the Quality of Education in the ‘University 3.0’
Model,” 2022)
● Universities
adopting the University 3.0 model are encouraged to establish venture funds and
Technopark to support the commercialization of research and foster an
entrepreneurial spirit among students (“Challenges of the New Age: Ensuring the
Quality of Education in the ‘University 3.0’ Model,” 2022).
8.1.2.3.2 Challenges and Opportunities in Higher Education
● Despite
the potential of Education 3.0, higher education institutions face challenges
in implementing these changes due to dysfunctional infrastructures and
traditional teaching methods. Innovative strategies are needed to overcome
these barriers and fully realize the benefits of Education 3.0 (Education 3.0,
2022).
● The
shift towards Education 3.0 requires reevaluating teaching practices to ensure
they are dynamic and incorporate effective use of technology. This shift is
crucial for preparing students for the interconnected and digital society they
will enter (Souza & Schneider, 2022).
8.1.2.3.2 Aligning Education with Workforce Needs
● Education
3.0 emphasizes skill-based education and the separation of learning from
certification. This approach addresses the gap between higher education and the
skills required by modern employers, promoting verifiable credentials and
personalized education-to-employment pathways (“Learning 3.0,” 2022).
● The
focus on developing intellectual capital within the University 3.0 framework
highlights the importance of aligning educational outcomes with the needs of
businesses and the investment community, ensuring the practical value of higher
education (Ермолаев & Ларионов, 2021).
While Education 3.0 offers a promising vision for the future
of learning, it also presents challenges that must be addressed. The transition
requires a cultural shift from traditional methods to more innovative and
flexible approaches within educational institutions. This shift is essential to
meet the diverse needs of learners and the evolving demands of the global
workforce. As institutions navigate this transition, they must balance integrating
technology with preserving educational quality and equity.
8.1.2.4 Education 4.0
8.1.2.4.1 The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Education
In the book “Industry 4.0 Technologies for Education”,
Kaliraj and Devi (2022b) explain that Education 4.0 is in line with industrial
processes that profoundly impact education as follows:
- Curriculum
Development: Industry 4.0 necessitates developing new curricula
incorporating digital tools and technologies. This includes designing
courses integrating artificial intelligence, machine learning, IoT, and
big data analytics applications into various disciplines such as science,
social science, arts, and education (Kaliraj & Devi, 2022b, p.xxix, p.7).
- Skill
Development: The focus of education is shifting towards equipping
students with the skills necessary to thrive in a volatile, uncertain,
complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) world. This includes fostering
communication, collaboration, competence, creativity, and critical
thinking, often called the 5Cs (Kaliraj & Devi, 2022b, p. 3).
- Personalized
Learning: Education 4.0 leverages advanced analytics to provide
personalized learning experiences. This approach treats each student as an
individual, tailoring educational content to meet diverse learning needs
and desired outcomes (Kaliraj & Devi, 2022b, p.3).
- Integration
of Technology: The use of technologies such as augmented reality (AR),
virtual reality (VR), and extended reality (XR) is becoming prevalent in
educational settings. These technologies enable dynamic and interactive
learning environments, such as virtual labs, which align practical
experiments with industry needs (Kaliraj & Devi, 2022b, p.xxx).
- Digital
Infrastructure: The digital era demands robust digital infrastructure
in educational institutions. This includes using learning management
systems, online content creation tools, and mobile-based learning tools to
facilitate teaching, learning, and evaluation processes (Kaliraj &
Devi, 2022b, p. 6).
- Global
Connectivity and Collaboration: Industry 4.0 fosters global
connectivity, allowing educational institutions to collaborate across
borders. This connectivity enhances the exchange of knowledge and
resources, preparing students for a globalized workforce (Kaliraj &
Devi, 2022b, p. xxix).
- Focus
on Cognitive Skills: There is an increased emphasis on developing
cognitive and metacognitive skills, such as critical thinking and
problem-solving, to adapt to rapidly changing technological environments.
These skills are crucial for personal and professional success in the
digital age (Kaliraj & Devi, 2022b, p. 7).
Overall, Industry 4.0 is driving a transformation in
education, aligning it with the needs of a digital and interconnected world.
This transformation is essential for preparing students to meet the challenges
and opportunities of the future workforce.
Illustration 1: Education
in the Era of Industry 4.0
The illustration shows
that we can use our modern technology in Education 4.0 to prepare students for
various careers in Industry 4.0 (Kaliraj & Devi, 2022b, p.4).
_049.jpg){kind=spacer}
8.1.2.4.2 Key Features of Education 4.0
Education 4.0 is a transformative approach that aligns
educational practices with the technological advancements of Industry 4.0. Again,
Kaliraj and Devi (2022b) highlight some key features that distinguish Education
4.0 from the previous:
● Personalized
Learning: Education 4.0's vision responds to student needs using machine
learning and algorithmic thinking. This approach recognizes that each student
has unique learning preferences and goals, allowing for a more customized and
effective learning process.
● Integration
of Advanced Technologies: Artificial intelligence technology, like machine
learning, augmented reality, and virtual reality, is central to Education 4.0.
These tools create immersive and interactive learning environments that enhance
student engagement and understanding.
● Focus
on the 5Cs: Education 4.0 emphasizes developing five critical skills: Communication,
Collaboration, Competence, Creativity, and Critical
thinking. These skills are essential for students to thrive in the rapidly
changing and complex world of Industry 4.0.
● Alignment
with Industry Needs: The curriculum in Education 4.0 is designed to meet
the demands of Industry 4.0. The schools will include corporations as their
stakeholders. They would participate in the curriculum design that guarantees
suitable outcomes for students.
● Emphasis
on Lifelong Learning: Education 4.0 encourages a mindset of continuous
learning and adaptability. As technological advancements evolve, students have
the skills and knowledge to keep pace with these changes and remain competitive
in their careers.
● Use
of Extended Reality (XR): Extended reality technologies create dynamic and
flexible learning environments, including virtual and augmented reality. These
technologies allow for practical experiments and simulations aligned with
industry needs and individual learner requirements.
● Preparation
for the VUCA World: Education 4.0 aims to prepare students for a volatile,
uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) world. Students are better equipped to
navigate and succeed in this challenging environment by integrating cognitive
and critical thinking skills with technological tools.
In summary, Education 4.0 represents a significant shift
towards a more personalized, technology-driven educational model that prepares
students for the demands of the modern world. AI has become a personal
assistant for educators and students. Even though modern technology like AI or
mobile devices has become normal and ready to use daily, educators and students
must develop more digital and literacy skills. AI can benefit and damage the
educational field if we do not train it properly. Without proper prompts and
commands, we cannot bring the best of AI for academic purposes.
Illustration 2: A
Comparison of Education 1.0 to 4.0:
|
Feature |
Education
1.0 |
Education
2.0 |
Education
3.0 |
Education
4.0 |
|
Focus |
Teacher-centered, rote learning, memorization. |
Learner-centered, collaborative learning, integration of
technology. |
Personalized learning paths, data analytics, immersive
technologies. |
Human-centered learning, blurring lines between physical
and digital, lifelong learning, skills development for the future. |
|
Methods |
Lectures, textbooks, standardized tests. |
Online forums, Wikipedia, multimedia presentations, and learning
management systems. |
Adaptive learning platforms, learning analytics, virtual
reality, augmented reality, gamification. |
Personalized and immersive learning experiences, blended
learning, focus on creativity, critical thinking, collaboration, and
communication skills. |
|
Technology |
Minimal: blackboards, textbooks. |
Computers, internet, LMS like Blackboard and Moodle. |
AI, machine learning, VR/AR headsets, advanced learning
analytics platforms. |
AI-powered personalized learning platforms and seamless
AR/VR integration focus on human-technology synergy. |
|
Analogy: |
Imagine a traditional classroom with rows of desks, a
teacher lecturing at the front, and students diligently taking notes. |
Think of classrooms equipped with computers, students
engaging in group projects using online tools, and teachers facilitating
discussions rather than solely lecturing. |
Envision a learning environment where AI tailors learning
content based on individual student needs, VR transports students to
historical events, and real-time feedback guides their progress. |
Imagine a future where learning is ubiquitous,
personalized, and integrated seamlessly into our lives. AI tutors provide
personalized guidance, while immersive experiences foster creativity and
problem-solving skills. |
8.1.3 Conclusion
"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can
use to change the world."
- Nelson Mandela (1918 – 2013)
Nelson Mandela was a South African anti-apartheid
revolutionary, political leader, and philanthropist who served as President of
South Africa from 1994 to 1999. He was the country's first black head of state
and the first elected in a fully representative democratic election. His
government focused on dismantling the legacy of apartheid by tackling institutionalized
racism and fostering racial reconciliation. Inadequately described as a black
nationalist and socialist, he served as President of the African National
Congress party from 1991 to 1997. He has proved to himself that education is
his powerful weapon for his fight for justice and the common good of his
people.
Our world is rapidly changing with technological advancement
and the Industrial Revolution. This chapter has explored the profound
transformation in education brought about by the advent of the Digital Era and
the emergence of Industry 4.0. Education 4.0 represents a significant evolution
in educational paradigms, aligning closely with the technological advancements
of Industry 4.0. It is a transformative approach integrating advanced digital
technologies, such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, augmented
reality, and virtual reality, to create personalized, interactive, and
immersive learning experiences. Education 4.0 emphasizes the development of the
5Cs - communication, collaboration, competence, creativity, and critical
thinking - which are essential skills for students to thrive in the rapidly
changing and complex world of the Digital Era.
This new educational model is designed to meet the demands
of Industry 4.0 and change our world. Like Nelson Mandela, we must ask
ourselves, are we ready to adapt to this changing period so that we can change
the world or let the world change us?
References
Eshet-Alkalai,
Y., & Soffer, O. (2012). Guest Editorial-Navigating in the Digital Era: Digital
Literacy: Socio-Cultural and Educational Aspects. Educational Technology
& Society.
Memory bytes:
history, technology, and digital culture. (2004). Choice Reviews Online,
42(03), 42–1376. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-1376
Pies, I. (2017).
Ökonomische Bildung 2.0: Eine ordonomische Perspektive. Research Papers in
Economics.
M. Žitinski (2005). Concept of Education.
METODIÈKI OGLEDI, 12 (2005) 1, 81–94, University of Dubrovnik
Vladimir, P.
(2018). Education is the formation of personality and the destiny of a man.
https://doi.org/10.2991/ICTPPFMS-18.2018.41
Waks, L. J.
(2012). Education 2.0: Teaching and Learning in the Information Age.
Valiente, O.
(2010b). .1-1 in Education: Current Practice, International Comparative
Research Evidence and Policy Implications. OECD Education Working Papers, No.
44,.
Valiente, O.
(2010a). 1-1 in Education: Current Practice, International Comparative Research
Evidence and Policy Implications. Research Papers in Economics.
https://doi.org/10.1787/5KMJZWFL9VR2-EN
Anja, B., Diana,
B., Benjamin, H., Ester, S., & Riina, V. (2013). Overview and analysis of
1:1 learning initiatives in Europe. Research Papers in Economics.
https://doi.org/10.2791/20333
Padeli, P.,
Sediyono, E., Hasibuan, Z. A., Maulana, S., & Faturahman, A. (2022). iLearning
Education 2.0 Based MooC Platform as Collaborative Learning Smart Technology.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIT55355.2022.10118808
iLearning
Education 2.0 Based MooC Platform as Collaborative Learning Smart Technology.
(2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccit55355.2022.10118808
Álvarez, G. Y.
C., & Zapata, D. A. O. (2019). Algunas posibilidades de incorporación de
la web 2.0 en la educación. https://doi.org/10.22209/RHS.V7N1A05
Bilton, C.
(2020). Creativity 2.0: New approaches to creative economy work and
education in the creative industries.
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839101106.00023
Tirziu, A.-M.,
& Vrabie, C. (2015b). Education 2.0: Universities’ e-learning methods. Social
Science Research Network.
Tirziu, A.-M.,
& Vrabie, C. (2015a). Education 2.0: E-Learning Methods. Social Science
Research Network.
Babic, S.,
Kresic, M., & Kucel, K. (2014). E-education 2.0: Students’ digital identity
and online learning activities. International Convention on Information and Communication
Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MIPRO.2014.6859666
Cook, K. C.,
& Grant-Davie, K. (2016). Online Education 2.0: Evolving, Adapting, and
Reinventing Online Technical Communication.
Kim, J. (2017). Learning
2.0 in Knowledge Economy: A Case Study of a Pilot Project in Zambia.
https://doi.org/10.5296/IJRD.V4I2.11110
Klaus, H. G.
(2023). The Use of Web 3.0 in University E-learning, Quality Assurance, and
Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003322252-7
Qassrawi, R.
(2022). Education 3.0 Underpinned with the Heutagogical Approach for a Smooth
Shift to Distance Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of
Education and Practice. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v11i1.3238
Songkram, N.,
Chootongchai, S., Khlaisang, J., & Koraneekij, P. (2021). Education 3.0
system to enhance twenty-first-century skills for higher education learners in
Thailand. Interactive Learning Environments.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1592197
Rodin, A. B.,
Kurilov, S. N., & Смирнова, М. И. (2024). University 3.0 and Graduate
Competence in Modern Engineering Education.
https://doi.org/10.1109/inforino60363.2024.10551998
Challenges of the
new age: ensuring the quality of education in the “university 3.0” model.
(2022). Journal of Science and Innovative Development.
https://doi.org/10.36522/2181-9637-2022-6-7
Education 3.0.
(2022). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6878-1.ch008
Souza, A. A. N.,
& Schneider, H. N. (2022). Da educação 1.0 à educação 3.0: desafios para a
prática docente no Século XXI.Olhar de Professor.
https://doi.org/10.5212/olharprofr.v.25.17555.014
Learning 3.0.
(2022). Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development Book
Series. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-3809-1.ch006
Ермолаев, К. Н.,
& Ларионов, А. В. (2021). University 3.0" as the genesis of
intellectual capital. Экономика и Предпринимательство.
https://doi.org/10.34925/eip.2021.134.9.013
Perumal, M.,
Rathinammal, M., Karthikeyan, P., Karthikeyan, K., Prashanth, A., Prashanth,
A., Ravi, M., & Thirupathi, M. (n.d.). First edition published 2023 by
CRC Press.
Kaliraj, P.,
& Devi, T. (2022b). Industry 4.0 Technologies for education. In Auerbach
Publications eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003318378
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น